Site icon Hot Pepper Communications

Double negatives: when to use them and when to abhor them

Double negatives: when to use them and when to abhor them

I can’t believe I haven’t written an article on double negatives yet!

Double negatives are basically two negative words used to present a single negative meaning. A famous example are two lines from Pink Floyd’s Another Brick in the Wall:

We don’t need no education
We don’t need no thought control

Both sentences use the negative words “not” and “no”, but the usage seems to imply a single negative thought (either “We don’t need education” or “We need no education”, for example).

Setting aside the possibility that it was written entirely as an ironic commentary on contemporary society, the point of this article isn’t to criticize Roger Waters’ choice in lyrics. Certainly there are many other well-known double negatives (Rolling Stones’ “I can’t get no satisfaction”, as another example), but the usage is quite pervasive in informal speech.

Using double negatives like these actually turns the sentences into positives. Here’s what they actually mean:

This is why double negatives seem to garner so much negative attention.

That being said, there are some instances when double negatives are acceptable. In those cases, it’s usually “not” used with negative adjectives often starting with prefixes like “un” or “im”.

In each instance, the speaker is trying to be negative but not too negative: it was technically possible, but quite difficult; it was appealing, but still pretty gross; happy, but just barely.

Here’s another example:

In this case, the speaker discusses something they did by emphasizing what they didn’t do; it leaves the reader with an impression of being compelled to do something.

What are your thoughts on the double negative?

Exit mobile version